Dec 1, 20244 min read

The business case

Updated: Dec 3, 2024

You would not normally expect these sabotage tactics from a legitimate campaign, but you would expect it from a rape legitimization effort.

Finances, business opportunities and jobs have been sabotaged in a blatant coverup of rape and an attempt on a person's life. After this attempt failed, every technique possible was applied to ruin his life. In this case, when jealousy takes over the feeble criminal mind, it uses up every resource to manipulate others who may otherwise be inclined to side with the one who was attacked in the first place. I say criminal mind, but I really mean Satan. May God protect us from his lies.

Who's idea was it to go after employment, business and even intellectual property? Should the nature of the intellectual property theft be shared in order to pin-point the problem, or are we up to date in that respect? Who is being supplied with private information? Did the infamous donations originate from overseas? What motivation would this body from overseas have? Are foreign conflicts being carried out on Canadian soil? Is this why suspect #1 bragged about how relationships get destroyed via smear campaign while everyone else debates and goes crazy? Is that not an insult to the country? How low does one's self-esteem have to be in order to excuse this blatant abuse of power and also the system? He does not respect any of you, yet you prop up the likes of himself and his radical sidekick. Why? Where did the finances for this harassment operation come from exactly? Was there any mondey laundering involved?

Did the entrapment effort actually start in 2010, when the initial complaint made to police included that the rape victim and suspect #1 were both excited about something called "burisma"? Why? Are there drug-trafficking networks involved? What about child-traffickers? What is the extent of their involvement? Why did he mention the lady who is currently serving a sentence? Who went to the Bahamas, apart from the former employer of the target? Where in the Bahamas did they go? Who else went there, and what was done there? Who paid suspect #1 for his involvement? This employer was his close friend whose checks he would deposit every morning at the newspaper agency, and that is not in question. He started working as his accountant after the target had left at the rape victim's direction. The target had told her of a lady that the boss knew. He saw her at a gathering in the SW. He never spoke to her, but the victim said she was "one of them" and told him to quit immediately. She had also said that the person who separated them was into heroin and fentanyl. Who was that?

Why did the rape victim, during her trauma and silencing, also make trips to the news agency in the morning? Was there ever an attempt at poisoning the target, perpetrated by suspect #1? If so, then who made the substance by which he was to be poisoned? Is this why the residential graffiti from 2019 was perpetrated as if there would be no consequences for it? Are we beginning to see a pattern emerge? Do businesses need to be sabotaged to help them achieve their Marxist utopia of corruption?

Is it a simple case of extortion? After those who knew about the attack were silenced, were they also extorted in relation to the attack, in order to further the interests of a treacherous gang of radical drug and human traffickers, or those who seek to undermine the process and steal valor, falsely attributing drug busts and things of that nature to their own treacherous actions? Who funded the suppression effort? Could you not have simply enacted a protection program when the video camera was reported to be taken without consent, in the early days of 2010? The microphone was also damaged upon it's return. It's not just about a $120 camera, it's about a constant targeting scheme and the various points in time when the targeting or even the rape itself could have been prevented. But of course, destructive sadists will never care. It's just a camera, just a rape, just a life, just a coverup, just financial sabotage in every possible way, just an asset, and just a defamatory smear campaign.

Just a few TV shows and movies. More on that in another post.

Where is/are the rape victim(s) now? Who exactly kept them from speaking out? Who watched over them like a kidnapper with a license to do so? Who ordered the attack in the first place, and on who's behalf?

Did this targeting pave the way for ground-level gangs to provoke, attack and falsely report about the target? Were the freezing of bank accounts and other forms of financial sabotage laughed about, as citizens and seniors suffered at the hands of a biased campaign against their legal sources of income, assets and future prospects of earning a living? Maybe now we should ask, who exactly took the credit for exposing the people related to the lady who currently sits in jail? Do you like taking other people's work and calling it your own? Are you modern day slave-owners in that respect?