When ACAB, the anti-police, Marxist anarchists hint at women in sexual ways in relation to their private information linked to death threats, then you know we have a problem.
In Calgary, we have an epidemic of attention-seeking, self-entitled scum harassing and going after women. Especially survivors of sexual assault. Real democratic. When someone shows up and reports the hints, he gets given the trespassing speech. It's a public parking garage owned by the city next to a university, not area 51.
What is the reason that silencing, coercion and intimidation are so easily covered up? Who initiates attacks after a call is made to police, explaining that a rape occured?
Why is the rape itself such a forbidden topic? What happened?
Does the TSA need to be falsely warned about people who ask questions? Do they need to be labeled flight risks because they ask questions like, "who raped you", "was it suspect #1", and "was it suspect #2" followed by "what about suspect #3"?
Why are questions pertaining to this coverup treated with a weaponization of the Department of Justice against the complainant?
Why is sabotage allowed?
Why is defaming people with lies allowed?
Is blatant gaslighting a regular practice at the department of rape legitimization, actual malice, provocation, perjury, unreasonable search or seizure, defamatory libel, forced confinement, privacy invasions, harassment and intimidation?
Why are thefts and also vandalism of cars, followed by identity theft allowed? The first vandalism and theft of over $2500 was a few weeks after taking a graffiti tagger to court. Who did this, and why? Is busting bigoted fanatics who happen to hate white people and shout "death to Israel" against Canada's interests? If it was any other country upon which he had wished death, it would be frowned upon. This means he wished death upon good people as well. Such people had access to private information. Why? Is this gang perpetrating acts of violence and perpetuating acts of intimidation or identity theft on Canadian citizens, in support for Hamas?
Why are statements blacked out under FOIP?
What is in those blacked out statements?
Will this targeting, coercion and intimidation be stopped or will it be allowed to continue? Or are we encouraged to take matters into our own hands? Why would anyone do that? Is it in order to create a fear of court order violations, or reasonable doubt in some other staged event?
Who's idea was it to target the one who reported the rape and was attacked, with the full support of the DOJ? Who contributed verbally, physically or financially to these various targeting schemes?
Is this a conspiracy to revoke people's rights with the law on their side?
Are these radicals being allowed to view private communications and reports? Why?
Who leaked the private information to them? If it was hacked like the bank accounts of dissenting voices, then who hacked them?
What a surprise.
This started in 2010, and continues on to this day. It may be because of policy, but it may also be because evil exists. More on that in another post. These pictures will illustrate the problem. This is my Bohemian Grove exposé, only the local trash version. Imagine that the effigy is the life of a real person.
The existence of evil only proves that there is good in this world as well.
Just to recap:
Radicals with private information are infiltrating private communications in order to aid in the rape coverup from 2010, enact coercion and intimidation, or as a rapist would put it, grooming trauma victims like a stand-up all around good samaritan. Are the anarchists united in a cause for exercising tyranny and using laws or judicial procedures against citizens' rights? Does this cost these citizens money as well, or does this sabotage stop at forcefully occupying someone else's time, effort, sense of safety, well-being and denying them opportunites?
What is the reason for all the hatred, sabotage and spite? Is there a reason that freezing or hacking bank accounts of these citizens is not off limits? What is the reason?
2. Schools are supporting this indoctrination effort. Are they paid to do so? Is there a budget for this? What is it called, and where does this payment originate?
3. ACAB, radicals, drug traffickers (fentanyl and heroin in particular) and the Freemasons seem to be connected by their goals involving sabotage and a coverup of an attempt on someone's life, but almost certainly through the ACAB member's father's political donations to buy him immunity from prosecution, or so it seems. Countless temptresses were deployed to entrap the male target and make him look untrustworthy. It never worked. What were they trying to prove to themselves? If not, then who were they trying to prove themselves to exactly? Is there any imbezzlement, influence peddling, bribery, rape, false allegations or anything nefarious involved?
Comentários